·科學·
C1

How Long Can Humans Really Live? From 194-Year Models to Skeptical Realities

人類究竟能活多久?從194歲的模型推算到懷疑論的現實情況

#longevity#human lifespan#biogerontology#aging#demographics
0:00 / 0:00

How long can a human being possibly survive? For decades, biogerontologists have debated the ultimate upper boundary of human lifespan, pointing to extraordinary outliers like France’s Jeanne Calment—who officially died in 1997 at the age of 122 years and 164 days—as proof of what the human organism can achieve. Yet, as researchers deploy advanced statistical models and computer simulations to test the limits of human biology, estimates for our maximum potential longevity have diverged wildly, ranging from a staggering theoretical ceiling of 194 years down to a grounded, skeptical estimate of just 115 years.

pointing to ... as proof of= 引用特定事例或證據以證明某個概念為真

Recent theoretical work highlights how far potential life extension might stretch if medical breakthroughs successfully target the primary mechanisms of biological decay. In a thought experiment conducted by researchers at the Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology and the Artificial Intelligence Research Institute in Moscow, scientists modeled a scenario where all treatable causes of aging are cured, leaving only unfixable cellular DNA damage. Under those ideal conditions, their model pushed the theoretical upper boundary of human life to 194 years. Other biological models examine physiological resilience—tracking short-term fluctuations in blood cell counts among elderly adults to measure recovery from severe illness. These studies indicate that physiological resilience typically breaks down around age 120, imposing a hard limit of roughly 150 years even for the most resilient individuals.

imposing a hard limit of= 設定或施加絕對且不可突破的限制或上限

However, applying these mathematical projections to the real world encounters a major hurdle: pervasive flaws in historical demographic records. Longevity researcher Saul Newman, author of Morbid: Debunking Modern Longevity Science, points out that supercentenarian data is frequently distorted by clerical errors and systemic pension fraud. In Greece, investigations revealed that nearly 70 percent of registered centenarians were already deceased while relatives continued collecting their checks, with similar errors and fraud identified in Japan. Globally, roughly 98 percent of claims to lifespans exceeding 115 years cannot be verified. In countries with rigorous birth records spanning over 150 years, not a single person has been proven to live past 115, suggesting that despite ambitious theoretical models, 115 remains the most reliable ceiling for human longevity.

despite ... remains= 表示儘管存在相反的理論模型或主張,某項結論依然保持確定

學習筆記

文法整理

句型意思
pointing to ... as proof of引用特定事例或證據以證明某個概念為真
imposing a hard limit of設定或施加絕對且不可突破的限制或上限
despite ... remains表示儘管存在相反的理論模型或主張,某項結論依然保持確定

詞彙整理

單字等級意思
resilienceB2恢復力、韌性(生物體或系統從困難或疾病中快速恢復的能力)
staggeringB2令人震驚的、驚人的(極大的)
outliersC1離群值、極端值(與其他觀察結果有顯著差異的個體)
divergedC1相左、分歧(意見、路徑或預估數據出現極大差異)
pervasiveC1無處不在的、普遍存在的(廣泛蔓延於各處的)

延伸學習

  • 關於人類壽命的爭論揭示了理論生物模型(細胞在理想條件下可能達到的極限)與實證人口統計驗證(真實歷史記錄所能證實的數據)之間的顯著差距。
  • 超級人瑞(110歲以上長者)的研究需要極其嚴格的審查,因為歷史人口統計記錄中的錯誤以及系統性年金詐領經常會誇大高齡主張。

練習

測試你剛學到的內容。

  1. Yet, as researchers deploy advanced statistical models and computer simulations to test the limits of human biology, estimates for our maximum potential longevity have   wildly, ranging from a staggering theoretical ceiling of 194 years down to a grounded, skeptical estimate of just 115 years.

  2. According to the article, why do some researchers consider 115 years to be the most reliable upper limit for human lifespan?

  3. What does the pattern 'imposing a hard limit of' mean in this context?

Source: New Scientist